In a few weeks time the present hoo-hah about the BBC – a
hoo-hah mostly manufactured by others in the print media who are desperately
trying to head Lord Leveson off at the pass – will, with any luck, be reduced
to an item on the end-of-year news round-ups that fill a few hours at the end
of December.
A couple of suggestions, then, as to what should happen
next:
Firstly, abolish the post of Director General. It’s simply
too big a job for any one man to be able adequately to fill. Replace it with
two positions; Director General
(Operations) and Director General (Production). The first takes care of the
business and political end of the corporation, deals with shitstorms like the
one going on right now, and decides where the money’s to be spent. He also simplifies
the management structure that has beknighted the BBC since John Birt was in
charge. The other handles the creative side of the BBC, allocates the budget
given by DG (Ops), and makes sure the corporation’s output is what it should be
- the best television and radio it’s possible to be. This post should be filled
by someone from the creative industries, someone along the lines of Michael
Grade. In fact, it should be held by Michael Grade, full stop,
Secondly, change the way the BBC is funded. No, calm down
over there in Daily Mail Land, not abolish the licence fee (although maybe the
new DG (Ops) should make ‘we will abolish the licence fee’ his first public
statement, just to give Rupert Murdoch that final fatal heart attack. Then he
can say “Just kidding!” and get on with his job unbothered by the ancient
bastard). I advocate we abolish the system by which the licence fee goes to the
Government who then decide how much of it goes to the BBC.
Instead, we just give it to the BBC. Free the corporation
from having to kowtow to some arse who’d really rather see it sold off or
crippled. Let it know that the licence fee is there wholly as funding for a
media giant that is free of outside influence and commercial necessity, but
also let it know that the fee is reliant on those who pay it, and whose
consideration must absolutely be at the forefront of everything the BBC does.
Because, quite simply, the BBC is glorious. It must stay
that way. Yes, it makes mistakes, and it has done recently in a shockingly bad
way, but those mistakes must be reconciled, and apologised for, and those
adversely affected must be compensated. And when that’s done the BBC should be
allowed to get on with the job of being glorious, of making astounding
television programmes, and unmissable radio, and of having the only news
organisation that is completely vital, and it must be allowed to do this
without some high-pitched nincompoop trying to sell the user some type of
appalling rubbish every ten minutes, without having to worry whether a new
series is bland enough to pull in enough advertisers, without the need – a need
which is absolutely a part of any commercial medium – to consider anything
other that the satisfaction of its users.
That is all.
No comments:
Post a Comment